Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring over netloc functionality #117

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jsquyres
Copy link
Member

@jsquyres jsquyres commented Oct 1, 2014

Hwloc 2.0 will include "network locality" functionality as a separate library.

We have re-organized the source tree a bit to accommodate both normal hwloc and the new netloc functionality.

jsquyres and others added 10 commits September 23, 2014 11:18
Also move tests/* to tests/hwloc/

Utils were already in specific directories.
Library source files go under netloc/* on the side of hwloc/
Headers, tests, utils are added near hwloc ones.

doc/main.doxy is added, which includes the former hwloc.doxy and the new netloc.doxy
To be better integrated later.
It doesn't work with all versions of gcc, so just take it out.
Bring
  akheron/jansson#203
and disable the configure code so that we don't pollute AM_CFLAGS everywhere.
-version-info is ignored for Libtool convenience libraries (and
Libtool warns about it).  So just remove it.
Thanks to Chih-Song Kuo for reporting the issue.
Add a global introduction, and the common install instructions
and strip things from hwloc and netloc sections.
Add references in all directions to ease things.

One thing that remains to be updated/merged is the bug report section,
we'll fix this later once the actual merge is done and once we know
where netloc bug reports should be sent.
hwloc.doxy and netloc.doxy have to be in doxygen INPUT
even if they are included in main.doxy
@bgoglin
Copy link
Contributor

bgoglin commented Oct 29, 2014

The branch was rebased/squashed and pulled in hwloc/master in commit 1ef7481

@bgoglin bgoglin closed this Oct 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants