Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add status to RFC template #17

Merged

Conversation

iredelmeier
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@songy23 songy23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# Replace this with your awesome RFC title

**Status:** `proposed`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we enumerate all the possible values? Maybe: draft, in-progress, approved?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely.

My thinking had been that proposed made sense for the template since that's the starting state.

Also, the possible states are enumerates here: https://github.com/open-telemetry/rfcs#the-rfc-life-cycle

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add an italicized comment w/ the URL spelled out, for reviewing the lifecycle?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I did not see all the definitions there. Looks good.

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# Replace this with your awesome RFC title

**Status:** `proposed`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I did not see all the definitions there. Looks good.

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit ee8ab48 into open-telemetry:master Aug 12, 2019
arminru added a commit to arminru/opentelemetry-rfcs that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
arminru added a commit to arminru/opentelemetry-rfcs that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
bogdandrutu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
bogdandrutu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
Oberon00 pushed a commit to dynatrace-oss-contrib/oteps that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2019
* Copy OC specs into specification dir

* Copy OT spec into specification/README.md

* Remove work-in-progress files

* Move specification/ into work_in_progress/
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/oteps that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants