Review of the Charta document

[BerndHekele]

Please review the current document "openETCS Charta" #2

The review is open until July, 18th..

Document under review:

Type	Name	due	pdf	source
	OETCS Charta	[https://github.com/openETCS/Charta/blob/master/Proposal/openETCS_Project_Cooperation_Charta.pdf)

Role	Partner
Product Owner	@KlausRuedigerHase
Review Team	All partners of the openETCS organisation, @openETCS/management-committers
Key Customers WP1	@KlausRuedigerHase
Key Customers WP2	@sbaro
Key Customers WP3	Fausto Cochetti
Key Customers WP4 VnV-plan	@MarcBehrens
Key Customers WP5	@PatrickDeutsch
Key Customers WP7	@jastram

At the recent PCC we agreed to start an "official" review for the charta according to the process. Please, take this serious, - a decision is forseen on the upcoming PCC.

The document is available here:
(https://github.com/openETCS/Charta/blob/master/Proposal/openETCS_Project_Cooperation_Charta.pdf).

@openETCS/management
@openETCS/management-committers

Please mention #2 within your issue or contribute with a pull request to the document itself.

Your comments will be collected via issue-tracker.
Deadline is July 18th of 2014.

br
Bernd

[MatthieuPERIN]

Hi everyone,

I have gave the document to my hierarchy / juridical service for assessment.

[MERCEmentre]

Hello,

I also gave the document to the person in charge of Intellectual Property.

One question: is the Charta for the openETCS project or/and the openETCS foundation?

Best regards,
d.

[MERCEmentre]

@BerndHekele My question has not been answered.

Besides, Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe (MERCE) agree with this Charta.

[BerndHekele]

@KlausRuedigerHase : can you please take this question?

[TonyCrabtree]

The openETCS Foundation should not be affected by what is written in the Charta. The work is being done by the Project and the Charta should reflect the needs and obligations of the Project. However, the Charta should be consistent with the Statutes of the openETCS Foundation. I hope this helps.
Regards,
Tony

[jastram]

Sorry, a pull request does not seem feasible, considering that the document is written in Word, not Latex. I'll file individual issues instead.

UPDATE: Review Complete.

[MarcBehrens]

A small remark on the key customer: Since this issue is a non technical document I would expect for all the cluster leader to be mandatory reviewers.

[MarcBehrens]

I have gave the document to my juridical service for assessment.

[MatthieuPERIN]

Document given to juridical service of CEA.

Issue #7 is blocking the process.

[MarcBehrens]

The document was classified as 'not critical from juridical point of view' so I agree to it.