Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review Architecture provisional document Christian Giraud #47

Open
faustco opened this issue Oct 15, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Review Architecture provisional document Christian Giraud #47

faustco opened this issue Oct 15, 2014 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@faustco
Copy link
Contributor

faustco commented Oct 15, 2014

Dear all,

please review the document: https://github.com/openETCS/SRS-Analysis/blob/master/System%20Analysis/WorkingRepository/Group2/WG3_OpenETCS_Database_V10b.pdf

@faustco faustco added this to the 03.11.2014 milestone Oct 15, 2014
@faustco faustco added Review and removed Review labels Oct 15, 2014
@faustco faustco assigned BaseliyosJacob and unassigned janWelte Oct 15, 2014
@faustco
Copy link
Contributor Author

faustco commented Oct 17, 2014

@faustco
Copy link
Contributor Author

faustco commented Oct 17, 2014

for rules applicable during document review please refer to :
https://github.com/openETCS/governance/blob/master/Review%20Process/OpenETCS_ReviewProcess_0.2.1.pdf
it is planned to have stage 1 review completed until November 3th in order to start the stage 2 review with the review team during first part of WP3 workshop

@UweSteinkeFromSiemens
Copy link
Contributor

@christiangiraud , @BaseliyosJacob :
Since both claim to specify the openETCS architecture, the content should consistently be integrated with https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/tree/master/openETCS%20ArchitectureAndDesign/SecondIteration into one document.

@BaseliyosJacob
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Uwe, thank you very much for your comment. We are working at the moment to get a consistency. And this is a goal by Fausto next Workshop on the WP 3 architecture.

@BerndHekele
Copy link
Member

@Nicolas-VanLandeghem
Dear Nicolas,
can you please review the document as well.

br
Bernd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants