Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump the maya version to 0.5.1 #236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2017

Conversation

prateekpandey14
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR bump the maya version to 0.5.1

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged):
fixes openebs/openebs#1064

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #236 into v0.5.0 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           v0.5.0     #236   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   17.55%   17.55%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines        5621     5621           
=======================================
  Hits          987      987           
  Misses       4527     4527           
  Partials      107      107

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4bdf139...e8b2487. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@kmova kmova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kmova kmova merged commit 3244696 into openebs-archive:v0.5.0 Dec 28, 2017
@prateekpandey14 prateekpandey14 deleted the bump-version branch January 3, 2018 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants