[BD-46] feat: defined types for Paragon exports

[PKulkoRaccoonGang]

Description

• Define types for Paragon exports

Issue: #1964

Merge Checklist

• If your update includes visual changes, have they been reviewed by a designer? Send them a link to the Netlify deploy preview, if applicable.
• Does your change adhere to the documented style conventions?
• Do any prop types have missing descriptions in the Props API tables in the documentation site (check deploy preview)?
• Were your changes tested using all available themes (see theme switcher in the header of the deploy preview, under the "Settings" icon)?
• Were your changes tested in the example app?
• Is there adequate test coverage for your changes?
• Consider whether this change needs to reviewed/QA'ed for accessibility (a11y). If so, please add wittjeff and adamstankiewicz as reviewers on this PR.

Post-merge Checklist

• Verify your changes were released to NPM at the expected version.
• If you'd like, share your contribution in #show-and-tell.
• 🎉 🙌 Celebrate! Thanks for your contribution.

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @PKulkoRaccoonGang!

When this pull request is ready, tag your edX technical lead.

[netlify]

❌ Deploy Preview for paragon-openedx failed.

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9797403
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/paragon-openedx/deploys/64df5134698e940008e3211b

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 75.00% and project coverage change: -0.01% ⚠️

Comparison is base (7e5b37d) 91.65% compared to head (9797403) 91.64%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2177      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.65%   91.64%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         236      236              
  Lines        4195     4203       +8     
  Branches     1012     1013       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3845     3852       +7     
- Misses        346      347       +1     
  Partials        4        4              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/Breadcrumb/index.jsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Card/CardStatus.jsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ChipCarousel/index.tsx	84.84% <ø> (ø)
src/ActionRow/index.tsx	93.33% <75.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[adamstankiewicz]

[clarification] Can you expand on why the ActionRowProps interface is defined in both this index.tsx file and the index.d.ts file?

[monteri]

Removed .d.ts for ActionRow since it has .tsx

[adamstankiewicz]

@monteri [clarification] So, the introduction of the .d.ts files are only necessary if the component is not already written in .tsx? I imagine we would eventually intend to migrate our other components' .jsx files to .tsx files. If we do that, what would happen to the .d.ts files? Would they remain, or get moved into the migrated .tsx files?

I guess I'm just wondering about consistency around where we define types across components (i.e., always included in the .d.ts, always included in the .tsx, or similar).

[openedx-webhooks]

@PKulkoRaccoonGang Even though your pull request wasn’t merged, please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.