feat: Add is_in_taxonomy boolean flag in ingredient parsing result #9968
Conversation
|
@himanshisrestha Could you update your branch with the main branch and update the tests results? It should solve the food_group issue. |
I should run the command |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9968 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.54% 49.65% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 67 71 +4
Lines 20650 20980 +330
Branches 4980 5028 +48
==========================================
+ Hits 10231 10418 +187
- Misses 9131 9270 +139
- Partials 1288 1292 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@stephanegigandet This is ready for review, please share your insights |
|
@himanshisrestha what you did looks good but you still have tests failing. Can you fix them ? |
|
Sure .. Working on it |
github-actions
bot
added
the
🥗🔍 Ingredients analysis
|
…9968) * Add is_in_taxonomy boolean flag in ingredient parsing result * fix isInTaxonomy update test results * lint added * expected results updated for ingredients processing unit test * modified expected results in ingredient nesting unit test * added is_in_taxonomy to fix api_v2_product_read tests * updated test results to multiple files * update test results in search
What
Added is_in_taxonomy boolean flag when the server is searching for the ingredient in the taxonomy. A screenshot to the current change is attached below.
Screenshot
Updated result after fix for food_groups
Related issue(s) and discussion
isInTaxonomyboolean flag in ingredient parsing result #9930