Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test "GFOIRequestInvalidSpatialFilter_foiRetrieval" fails with InvocationTargetException #33

Closed
lgoltz opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #34
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@lgoltz
Copy link
Contributor

lgoltz commented Apr 24, 2019

Tested with http://sensorweb.demo.52north.org/52n-sos-webapp/service?service=SOS&request=GetCapabilities&AcceptVersions=2.0.0 on a local docker environment.

Selected GET and all tests.

From the test report:

Error in call to extension function {public org.w3c.dom.NodeList com.occamlab.te.TECore.request(org.w3c.dom.Document,java.lang.String) 
throws java.lang.Throwable}: Exception in extension function java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException

And the error log:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to parse resource from http://sensorweb.demo.52north.org/52n-sos-webapp/service/kvp?service=SOS&version=2.0.0&request=GetFeatureOfInterest&spatialFilter=2019-04-24T13:33:05.181Z
                        ,0.0,10.0,0.0,10.0,urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326 
 null
	at com.occamlab.te.parsers.XMLValidatingParser.parse(XMLValidatingParser.java:227)
	... 604 more

Request send by the test: http://sensorweb.demo.52north.org/52n-sos-webapp/service/kvp?request=GetFeatureOfInterest&service=SOS&spatialFilter=2019-04-24T13:33:05.181Z ,0.0,10.0,0.0,10.0,urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326 &version=2.0.0

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

@keshav-nangare Can you please do a short test of this fix?

@dstenger dstenger modified the milestones: 1.15, 1.14 Aug 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants