-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8266796: Clean up the unnecessary code in the method UnsharedNameTable#fromUtf #3942
Conversation
👋 Welcome back gli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
@lgxbslgx This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@mcimadamore) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@mcimadamore Thanks for your review. Could I get your help to sponsor this patch? /integrate |
/sponsor |
@mcimadamore @lgxbslgx Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 5d761fc. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This little patch cleans up the redundant code. Please see the code below.
The
while (element != null)
has already checked theelement
. So theif (element == null)
is redundant and unnecessary.Thank you for taking the time to review.
Best Regards,
-- Guoxiong
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3942/head:pull/3942
$ git checkout pull/3942
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3942
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3942/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3942
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3942
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3942.diff