Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8289238: Refactoring changes to PassFailJFrame Test Framework #9300

Closed

Conversation

honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk commented Jun 28, 2022

Currently PassFailJFrame.positionTestFrame() and PassFailJFrame.addTestFrame() take Frame as input parameter, this has been changed to Window.

Refactored the above method names to reflect the functionality & input parameter type -
addTestWindow(), positionTestWindow()

Additionally added test fail reason to forceFail() to avoid NPE.

Benefits of the change -

  • Since Window is a parent class, this would allow the test frame to be a Window/Frame/Dialog and not be restricted to a Frame.
  • Code reusability - no need to have separate methods to manage Frame and Window
  • Additionally it would allow proper clean-up of window and its container subclasses which are added to the PassFailJFrame.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8289238: Refactoring changes to PassFailJFrame Test Framework

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9300/head:pull/9300
$ git checkout pull/9300

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9300
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9300/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9300

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9300

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9300.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 28, 2022

👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 28, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 28, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 28, 2022

Webrevs

* Dispose all the frame(s) i,e both the test instruction frame as
* well as the frame that is added via addTestFrame(Frame frame)
* Dispose all the windows(s) i,e both the test instruction frame and
* the testWindow that is added via addTestWindow(Window testWindow)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be windows instead of testWindow, because we can add plenty of them with addTestWindow()?

Otherwise looks good.

* testFrame
*
* @param testFrame test frame that the test is created
* testWindow
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like you accidentally removed the empty line that served as the visual delimiter.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@azvegint Thanks for catching it. Updated the PR with changes.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8289238: Refactoring changes to PassFailJFrame Test Framework

Reviewed-by: azvegint, aivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 40 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b6bd190: 8288985: P11TlsKeyMaterialGenerator should work with ChaCha20-Poly1305
  • ba670ec: 8289094: [JVMCI] reduce JNI overhead and other VM rounds trips in JVMCI
  • 0709a6a: 8284942: Proxy building can just iterate superinterfaces once
  • 2961b7e: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference
  • 167ce4d: 8289421: No-PCH build for Minimal VM was broken by JDK-8287001
  • 108cd69: 8283726: x86_64 intrinsics for compareUnsigned method in Integer and Long
  • b96ba19: 8289182: NMT: MemTracker::baseline should return void
  • 779b4e1: 8287001: Add warning message when fail to load hsdis libraries
  • 910053b: 8280235: Deprecated flag FlightRecorder missing from VMDeprecatedOptions test
  • 7b3bf97: 8289401: Add dump output to TestRawRSACipher.java
  • ... and 30 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d4b040f42dd0a9100ad1ffa55de4ae4f20e9f182...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@azvegint, @aivanov-jdk) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 28, 2022
@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2022

@honkar-jdk
Your change (at version 3539873) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@aivanov-jdk
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2022

Going to push as commit 15efb2b.
Since your change was applied there have been 40 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b6bd190: 8288985: P11TlsKeyMaterialGenerator should work with ChaCha20-Poly1305
  • ba670ec: 8289094: [JVMCI] reduce JNI overhead and other VM rounds trips in JVMCI
  • 0709a6a: 8284942: Proxy building can just iterate superinterfaces once
  • 2961b7e: 8285364: Remove REF_ enum for java.lang.ref.Reference
  • 167ce4d: 8289421: No-PCH build for Minimal VM was broken by JDK-8287001
  • 108cd69: 8283726: x86_64 intrinsics for compareUnsigned method in Integer and Long
  • b96ba19: 8289182: NMT: MemTracker::baseline should return void
  • 779b4e1: 8287001: Add warning message when fail to load hsdis libraries
  • 910053b: 8280235: Deprecated flag FlightRecorder missing from VMDeprecatedOptions test
  • 7b3bf97: 8289401: Add dump output to TestRawRSACipher.java
  • ... and 30 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d4b040f42dd0a9100ad1ffa55de4ae4f20e9f182...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 29, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 29, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jun 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2022

@aivanov-jdk @honkar-jdk Pushed as commit 15efb2b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants