-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: getTBinR: an R package for accessing and summarising the World Health Organisation Tuberculosis data #1219
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1219 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:377:in |
@seabbs - once you've made changes (as in |
@whedon generate pdf |
I'm not sure why that didn't work - let's try again (and notify @arfon as well) |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1219 with the following error: /app/vendor/ruby-2.4.4/lib/ruby/2.4.0/psych.rb:377:in |
Looks like I had a : that was causing issues. Hopefully fixed now @whedon generate pdf |
you definitely need to make the command the first thing in a comment - can you try again? |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
good - not sure why the command didn't work for you the other time. Maybe whedon was misbehaving... |
👋 @trallard - would you be willing to edit this submission? |
sure thing @danielskatz |
OK, the editor is @trallard |
Is there anything I can do to help move this along? |
🙋🏻♀️ Hi @seabbs (sorry for the delayed action) I will be performing the editorial duties for this submission. If you have any questions over the review process please feel free to @ me. The first step is to find suitable reviewers for this submission. Have you got any suitable people in mind? Otherwise, you can check the list of reviewers we have and suggest a few here. |
@whedon list reviewers |
Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers |
Hi @trallard - no problem. No external people in mind. Looking at the list (from bottom to top) here are a few that looked relevant (in no particular order):
Hope that helps - let me know if you need anything more. |
I was wondering if It was okay to do development work whilst awaiting/under review? I have the next version changes prepped and just waiting on this to implement (some time has come up whilst I avoid writing my thesis :)). Thanks! |
Dear reviewers, @stulacy Stuart are you able and willing to take this review? Title: Get TB Data in R |
@seabbs yes that is perfectly fine, we will just update the version after those improvements and the review Once two or more reviewers have agreed to help out we can proceed with the review process |
I would be happy to review this submission. |
thanks @rrrlw |
I also have time and could review this submission! |
OK, the reviewer is @rrrlw |
@whedon add @strengejacke as reviewer |
OK, @strengejacke is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1260. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Thanks, @arfon 🤦🏻♀️ I sometimes get the commands mixed up Now that we have two reviewers we are ready to proceed with the formal review so let's move over to the review issue! |
Submitting author: @seabbs (Sam Abbott)
Repository: https://github.com/seabbs/getTBinR
Version: v0.5.7
Editor: @trallard
Reviewers: @rrrlw, @strengejacke
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @seabbs. The JOSS editor Pending, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@seabbs if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: