Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: CRSocket: A web app component facilitating the administration of digital trials from a separate device #5468

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 57 comments
Assignees
Labels
HTML PHP pre-review TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented May 16, 2023

Submitting author: @henrikdvn (Henrik Dvergsdal)
Repository: https://github.com/henrikdvn/CRSocket
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.13 (CommTest)
Editor: @britta-wstnr
Reviewers: @rabdill, @lukaszjablonski
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3becacf85e23eb6be092c08148cb4be2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3becacf85e23eb6be092c08148cb4be2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3becacf85e23eb6be092c08148cb4be2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3becacf85e23eb6be092c08148cb4be2)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @henrikdvn. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @britta-wstnr.

@henrikdvn if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences labels May 16, 2023
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (1623.5 files/s, 224682.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      13            819            748           3059
HTML                            28            229              0           2194
PHP                             20            276            284            852
Markdown                         3            143              0            620
TeX                              1              9              0            152
CSS                              3             50              4             87
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            69           1527           1040           6982
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119241 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0260695 is OK
- 10.1111/desc.13193 is OK
- 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101649 is OK
- 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061528 is OK
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01021 is OK
- 10.1002/acp.3569 is OK
- 10.1177/0894439319851503 is OK
- 10.3233/JAD-160545 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1082

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@britta-wstnr do you have capacity for this? 😊

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi - this seems to be a bit outside of my expertise, so I would like to read the paper first to get a better overview! 🙂
But it seems to not be compiling, @henrikdvn can you have a look at that?

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@henrikdvn can you try putting the paper at the top level in the repo? I think this causes the problem with generating the pdf?

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (1305.1 files/s, 180597.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      13            819            748           3059
HTML                            28            229              0           2194
PHP                             20            276            284            852
Markdown                         3            143              0            619
TeX                              1              9              0            152
CSS                              3             50              4             87
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            69           1527           1040           6981
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1079

@henrikdvn
Copy link

@britta-wstnr: Sorry about the mess with the paper, but it compiles now. Don't know about the technical part, but I think the research significance may be within your field. Also found some reviewers on the list that I think should be able to review the software:
lukaszjablonski, Milantex, abhishekvp, kinow.

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot invite @britta-wstnr as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi - sorry for only getting back here now, this week has been busy! @henrikdvn thanks for suggesting reviewers! @oliviaguest I'll take this on then.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot assign @britta-wstnr as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @britta-wstnr is now the editor

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

To be transparent about the progress: I have reached out to reviewers via e-mail.

@henrikdvn
Copy link

henrikdvn commented Jun 2, 2023

@britta-wstnr Thanks. Is it ok to make minor changes at this stage? I sort of get blind for mistakes etc. when writing things and tend to discover them when I take a second look after a few day's break.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

You mean for the paper @henrikdvn ? That should be fine, go ahead!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

No success in inviting reviewers via e-mail so far, moving it here ...

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @abhishekvp and @lukaszjablonski 👋

Would you be willing to review the submission:
CRSocket: A web app component facilitating the administration of digital trials from a separate device
for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?

The review concerns the software CRSocket and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.

You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.

If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.

Thank you!
Britta

@lukaszjablonski
Copy link

Thank you @britta-wstnr. Yes, sure. I'm happy to review it.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Great, @lukaszjablonski, I appreciate it! 🙏
The reviewing process will start once I have found a sufficient number of reviewers, you will get pinged once we move forward.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Ping @abhishekvp 👋
Kind reminder for my review invitation (see comment above) 🙏

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @rabdill and @Milantex👋

Would you be willing to review the submission:
CRSocket: A web app component facilitating the administration of digital trials from a separate device
for The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)?

The review concerns the software CRSocket and a short paper about it. The review happens fully on GitHub.

You can learn more about the the review process and our conflict of interest policy in the reviewer guidelines here.

If you are available to review this submission, please let me know and I can add you as a reviewer. The review process will start (in a separate GitHub issue) once a sufficient number of reviewers have been found.

Thank you!
Britta

@rabdill
Copy link

rabdill commented Jul 10, 2023

Hi @britta-wstnr, I'd be happy to review.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @rabdill - that's great, I appreciate it! 🙏
I'll start the reviewing process soon - you'll get pinged about it.

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot add @rabdill as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rabdill added to the reviewers list!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot add @lukaszjablonski as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lukaszjablonski added to the reviewers list!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

Hi @lukaszjablonski and @rabdill ,
hi @henrikdvn,

let's move this submission to the reviewing step 🌱 . That means that this PRE-REVIEW will be closed and you will be pinged in a new thread - there'll be detailed info how to proceed there!

@britta-wstnr
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #5658.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
HTML PHP pre-review TeX Track: 4 (SBCS) Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants