[PRE REVIEW]: MathematicaStan, a Mathematica package to interact with Stan

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @vincent-picaud (Vincent Picaud)
Repository: https://github.com/stan-dev/MathematicaStan
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v2.2.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c16e8f7762a4c66b81ff5f0e743f1da"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c16e8f7762a4c66b81ff5f0e743f1da/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c16e8f7762a4c66b81ff5f0e743f1da/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c16e8f7762a4c66b81ff5f0e743f1da)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vincent-picaud . Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vincent-picaud if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: MathematicaStan, the Mathematica interface to Stan
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A Compendium of Conjugate Priors
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Stan: a Probabilistic Programming Language for Bay...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (427.4 files/s, 95156.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematica                      2            377            187            474
Markdown                         1             56              0            207
TeX                              1              4              0             23
Bourne Shell                     1              0              0              6
YAML                             1              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             6            437            187            712
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    63	Picaud Vincent
    16	picaud
     3	Vincent Picaud
     2	pixor
     1	Jonah Gabry

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1266

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ArviZ a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in Python
Submitting author: @canyon289
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @malmaud, @mattpitkin
Similarity score: 0.6904

Bernadette: Bayesian Inference and Model Selection for Stochastic Epidemics in R
Submitting author: @bernadette-eu
Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active)
Reviewers: @rowlandseymour, @strengejacke
Similarity score: 0.6608

MUQ: The MIT Uncertainty Quantification Library
Submitting author: @mparno
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @martinmodrak, @georgiastuart
Similarity score: 0.6536

fishStan: Hierarchical Bayesian models for fisheries
Submitting author: @rerickson-usgs
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @MikeKaller, @Cole-Monnahan-NOAA
Similarity score: 0.6522

fmcmc: A friendly MCMC framework
Submitting author: @gvegayon
Handling editor: @arokem (Retired)
Reviewers: @fabian-s
Similarity score: 0.6509

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[vincent-picaud]

@editorialbot commands Le jeu. 15 août 2024 à 18:59, The Open Journals editorial robot < ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot <https://github.com/editorialbot>, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: @editorialbot commands For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: @editorialbot generate pdf — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7108 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIMCE2ZS4ZO7U6FCPOWGOTZRTM7LAVCNFSM6AAAAABMSRPJ7SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJRG4ZDANRTGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[editorialbot]

Hello @vincent-picaud, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[crvernon]

@editorialbot query scope

👋 @vincent-picaud - Thank you for your submission to JOSS. I am going to run this review with our larger editorial board to see if it meets our substantial scholarly effort requirement due to being a smaller codebase. This process generally takes a few weeks and I'll get back to you with a decision as soon as possible.

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[vincent-picaud]

@crvernon Thank you, Chris, for the update and for considering my submission.
I appreciate your time and effort in this process.
I look forward to hearing back from you once a decision has been made.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot reject

👋 @vincent-picaud - thanks for your submission to JOSS. After further review from our editorial board, we will have to reject this submission on the grounds of the code base size being too small and thus not aligned with the JOSS substantial scholarly effort requirements.

Thank you and we wish you and your project all the best.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.