Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor improvements to Arabic translations #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

midosvt
Copy link
Member

@midosvt midosvt commented Jan 30, 2024

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 30, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@AmyrAhmady AmyrAhmady merged commit a243276 into openmultiplayer:master Jan 30, 2024
1 check passed
@RouatbiH
Copy link
Contributor

RouatbiH commented Feb 3, 2024

In Arabic, there is no word "سيرفر" and "أدمن"
You just wrote the English word, how to read it in Arabic, and this is not called translation

@midosvt في اللغة العربية الفصحى لا توجد كلمة سيرفر و أدمن
أنت فقط قمت بكتابة الكلمة الإنقليزية كيف تقرأ بالعربية وهذا لا يسمى ترجمة

@midosvt
Copy link
Member Author

midosvt commented Feb 3, 2024

I know what I am doing, and I am pretty sure anyone that does play video games know what those two are.

@RouatbiH
Copy link
Contributor

RouatbiH commented Feb 3, 2024

I know what I am doing, and I am pretty sure anyone that does play video games know what those two are.

Well, I know the players know what these words mean, but I just wanted to say this because the translation is correct and they can understand it. If the player wants English, he can choose English. There should be no confusion between languages. this is just an opinion.

Have a good day.

@midosvt
Copy link
Member Author

midosvt commented Feb 3, 2024

the old one was "خادم" which could refer to servant. "سيرفر" is much better. And have a good one you too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants