Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed: duplicate if statements #505

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 22, 2019

Conversation

nvanderperren
Copy link
Contributor

Tries to solve #418

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #505 into integration will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             integration    #505      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage          49.69%   49.7%   +0.01%     
  Complexity           987     987              
================================================
  Files                 55      55              
  Lines               7750    7748       -2     
  Branches            1406    1406              
================================================
  Hits                3851    3851              
+ Misses              3435    3433       -2     
  Partials             464     464
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...in/java/edu/harvard/hul/ois/jhove/RFC1766Lang.java 0% <0%> (ø) 0 <0> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e59ca7...4424173. Read the comment docs.

@carlwilson carlwilson self-requested a review October 22, 2019 12:10
@carlwilson carlwilson added bug A product defect that needs fixing P3 Low priority bugs labels Oct 22, 2019
@carlwilson carlwilson added this to the v1.24-m4 Release milestone Oct 22, 2019
Copy link
Member

@carlwilson carlwilson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 very minor change requested but that apart a thing of beauty, thanks. Went a bit operator blind checking the logic. Thanks muchly @nvanderperren

}
// This shouldn't happen
return false;
// This shouldn't happen
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove misleading comment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be fixed!

@carlwilson carlwilson merged commit 27aa82e into openpreserve:integration Oct 22, 2019
@nvanderperren nvanderperren deleted the issue/418 branch November 6, 2019 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug A product defect that needs fixing P3 Low priority bugs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants