You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are several notes that can indicate a desk rejection to the EiCs: Reviewer_Checklist, Action_Editor_Checklist, Official_Review, and Meta_Review
If one of these is posted without a field being violated, the process function checks the rest of the replies with the same invitation for violations. If no violations are found for those replies, then the submission's flag is set to false.
The issue is that the process function does not have information about the replies with different invitations, and it may unflag a submission because there are no checklists with violation fields set, but there may be official reviews with violation fields set.
Example: An official review has a field that raises the flag for desk rejection. An action editor checklist is then submitted with no fields indicating that the flag should be raised, and there are no other action editor checklists that indicate the flag should be raised either, so the flag is set to false even though the official review says that the flag should be true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are several notes that can indicate a desk rejection to the EiCs: Reviewer_Checklist, Action_Editor_Checklist, Official_Review, and Meta_Review
If one of these is posted without a field being violated, the process function checks the rest of the replies with the same invitation for violations. If no violations are found for those replies, then the submission's flag is set to false.
The issue is that the process function does not have information about the replies with different invitations, and it may unflag a submission because there are no checklists with violation fields set, but there may be official reviews with violation fields set.
Example: An official review has a field that raises the flag for desk rejection. An action editor checklist is then submitted with no fields indicating that the flag should be raised, and there are no other action editor checklists that indicate the flag should be raised either, so the flag is set to false even though the official review says that the flag should be true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: