Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-33351,OCPBUGS-22556,OCPCLOUD-2422: Update to kubernetes v1.29 #88

Merged

Conversation

cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]
Copy link

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 19, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Hi @cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (e5d6703) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (a3295de) into master Oct 23, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 26, 2023
@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (a3295de) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (efb9e03) into master Oct 26, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 26, 2023
@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (efb9e03) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (bfbc62a) into master Oct 30, 2023
@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (bfbc62a) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (141b154) into master Nov 2, 2023
@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (141b154) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (c58ecb8) into master Nov 6, 2023
@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (c58ecb8) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (cea7f47) into master Nov 9, 2023
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 9, 2023

Here we'll need to drop 6067ccd (UPSTREAM: 3887: default to kube-proxy health probes for Service type) as that PR never merged upstream and was instead closed.

Upstream instead decided to allow us to fix this by opting into a feature introduced with a different PR (kubernetes-sigs#4891), which recently merged.

That PR is being brought in by this rebase, but we must opt into it by setting clusterServiceLoadBalancerHealthProbeMode=servicenodeport as it defaults to shared in the Cloud config (in the openshift-config-managed/kube-cloud-config ConfigMap?).

@elmiko
Copy link

elmiko commented Nov 10, 2023

@damdo are you going to fix this up, or is the card still open?

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 13, 2023

@elmiko Not sure who owns/owned this rebase for 4.15

@cloud-team-rebase-bot cloud-team-rebase-bot bot changed the title Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (cea7f47) into master Merge https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure:master (66db17d) into master Nov 13, 2023
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 14, 2023

/test commitchecker

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2023

@damdo: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-azure-ovn
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • /test images
  • /test unit
  • /test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test verify-git-history

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test commitchecker

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 14, 2023

/test verify-git-history

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 14, 2023

/test verify-commits

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Nov 14, 2023

/label rebase/manual

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the rebase/manual Indicates the PR should not be rebased by the rebasebot. label Nov 14, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 17, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 17, 2024

@theobarberbany: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22556, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2422 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jan 17, 2024

@nrb we will want to run the payload tests to exercise and rehearse the upgrade story, considering that's the pain point that the previous health check carry was addressing, and that the newer approach is supposed to take the place of.

Thus launching some
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 10

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@damdo: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/db266e30-b564-11ee-8729-0d243ec58145-0

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jan 18, 2024

@nrb It looks like all payload upgrades have failed 😐 https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/db266e30-b564-11ee-8729-0d243ec58145-0 (see job-run-summary for aggregated we might need to investigate why) cc. @JoelSpeed

Copy link

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This commit is empty, can we drop it?

Makefile Outdated
Comment on lines 390 to 392
release-staging:
ENABLE_GIT_COMMANDS=false IMAGE_REGISTRY=$(STAGING_REGISTRY) $(MAKE) build-images push-images

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we use this, wondering if we need this change?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it came in from upstream as I was cherry-picking our stuff onto the Makefile.

https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure/blob/master/Makefile#L390 is where it's defined and https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure/blob/master/cloudbuild.yaml#L22 is where it's used.

I'd say we should keep it to make future rebases easier, but I'm not overly attached to that idea, either.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah my point was more, I don't understand why our commit changes this part of the makefile, should it not just be adding the include?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I see what I did; will fix.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jan 18, 2024

@nrb Had a chat with @xueqzhan which cleared up the air for us regarding the aggregated payload results.
They all passed but timed out during cleanup (the resource watch takes longer in 4.16), which is independent of this change and is going to be tracked by them separately.

So I think I'm happy with this PR, bare @JoelSpeed comment

@nrb
Copy link

nrb commented Jan 18, 2024

This commit is empty, can we drop it?

@JoelSpeed Done.

lobziik and others added 3 commits January 18, 2024 12:21
Signed-off-by: Nolan Brubaker <nolan@nbrubaker.com>
This fix should go in to the CCCMO, but carry this commit to enforce the
default until OCPBUGS-24486 is addressed there.

Signed-off-by: Nolan Brubaker <nolan@nbrubaker.com>
Copy link

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2024

@cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4295526 into openshift:master Jan 18, 2024
8 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22556: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22556 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-azure-cloud-controller-manager-container-v4.16.0-202401191549.p0.g4295526.assembly.stream for distgit ose-azure-cloud-controller-manager.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-azure-cloud-node-manager-container-v4.16.0-202401191549.p0.g4295526.assembly.stream for distgit ose-azure-cloud-node-manager.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-01-21-092529

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented May 9, 2024

/retitle OCPBUGS-33351,OCPBUGS-22556,OCPCLOUD-2422: Update to kubernetes v1.29

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-22556,OCPCLOUD-2422: Update to kubernetes v1.29 OCPBUGS-33351,OCPBUGS-22556,OCPCLOUD-2422: Update to kubernetes v1.29 May 9, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33351: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33351 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22556 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. rebase/manual Indicates the PR should not be rebased by the rebasebot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet