Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use the correct ServiceAccount for the operator #34

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2019
Merged

Use the correct ServiceAccount for the operator #34

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2019

Conversation

bison
Copy link
Contributor

@bison bison commented Feb 1, 2019

The role and binding were present in the CVO manifests, but the
actual ServiceAccount was missing. This adds it, and configures the
operator deployment to use it.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 1, 2019
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/retest

@paulfantom
Copy link
Contributor

/hold
/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Feb 1, 2019
@paulfantom paulfantom removed their assignment Feb 1, 2019
@paulfantom
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@bison
Copy link
Contributor Author

bison commented Feb 4, 2019

/test e2e-aws-operator

The Role and RoleBinding were present in the CVO manifests, but the
actual ServiceAccount for the operator was missing.  In addition, a
ClusterRole is needed for the cluster-scoped resource. This adds
these, and updates the operator deployment.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 4, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Feb 4, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2019
@frobware
Copy link
Contributor

frobware commented Feb 4, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2019
- apiGroups:
- cluster.k8s.io
resources:
- machinedeployments
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 even though not yet supported

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

Don't think cluster-autoscaler-operator needs permissions to updated endpoints. Other resources and verbs might need to be revisit. Let's do it after we deploy the kubemark actuator smoke testing. Good for now.

/lgtm

@bison
Copy link
Contributor Author

bison commented Feb 4, 2019

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3bb3ebc into openshift:master Feb 4, 2019
@bison bison deleted the fix-rbac branch February 4, 2019 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants