Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2008612: Proxy browser cache headers from plugin asset request #10153

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2021

Conversation

jhadvig
Copy link
Member

@jhadvig jhadvig commented Sep 29, 2021

Proxying all the headers except Cookie and X-CSRFToken

/assign @spadgett
/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@jhadvig: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2008612, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2008612: Proxy browser cache headers from plugin asset request

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 29, 2021
@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Sep 29, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@jhadvig: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2008612, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yapei

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 29, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one nit on the name.

@@ -89,6 +89,15 @@ func decodeSubprotocol(encodedProtocol string) (string, error) {

var headerBlacklist = []string{"Cookie", "X-CSRFToken"}

// pass through headers that are needed for browser caching and content negotiation,
// except "Cookie" and "X-CSRFToken" headers.
func ProxyRequestHeaders(originalRequest, newRequest *http.Request) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I think CopyRequestHeaders is more accurate and clear.

@jhadvig
Copy link
Member Author

jhadvig commented Sep 29, 2021

@spadgett comment addressed 👍

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0c06941 into openshift:master Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@jhadvig: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2008612 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2008612: Proxy browser cache headers from plugin asset request

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/backend Related to backend lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants