[4.15] OCPBUGS-30621: move test manifest to top-level directory

[dobsonj]

This is sort of a backport of #194 to 4.15 where aws-ebs is built (before azure-disk and azure-file were added). The intent is to eventually remove the legacy directory, which means we have to move the manifests first.

It also creates Dockerfile.test which already exists in the master branch but not 4.15.

$ cp legacy/aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator/test/e2e/manifest.yaml test/e2e/aws-ebs/
$ cp Dockerfile.aws-ebs.test Dockerfile.test

Also remove the legacy test-unit and verify targets from the Makefile (we should be running these against the code we compile instead).

/cc @openshift/storage

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

This is sort of a backport of #194 to 4.15 where aws-ebs is built (before azure-disk and azure-file were added). The intent is to eventually remove the legacy directory, which means we have to move the manifests first.

It also creates Dockerfile.test which already exists in the master branch but not 4.15.

$ cp legacy/aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator/test/e2e/manifest.yaml test/e2e/aws-ebs/
$ cp Dockerfile.aws-ebs.test Dockerfile.test

/cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@dobsonj: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/storage.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

This is sort of a backport of #194 to 4.15 where aws-ebs is built (before azure-disk and azure-file were added). The intent is to eventually remove the legacy directory, which means we have to move the manifests first.

It also creates Dockerfile.test which already exists in the master branch but not 4.15.

$ cp legacy/aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator/test/e2e/manifest.yaml test/e2e/aws-ebs/
$ cp Dockerfile.aws-ebs.test Dockerfile.test

/cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [dobsonj]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[dobsonj]

/retest-required

[openshift-ci]

@dobsonj: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jsafrane]

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-30620

[jsafrane]

/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jsafrane: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30620 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-30621: NO-JIRA: move test manifest to top-level directory

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-30620

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30620 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is sort of a backport of #194 to 4.15 where aws-ebs is built (before azure-disk and azure-file were added). The intent is to eventually remove the legacy directory, which means we have to move the manifests first.

It also creates Dockerfile.test which already exists in the master branch but not 4.15.

$ cp legacy/aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator/test/e2e/manifest.yaml test/e2e/aws-ebs/
$ cp Dockerfile.aws-ebs.test Dockerfile.test

Also remove the legacy test-unit and verify targets from the Makefile (we should be running these against the code we compile instead).

/cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[duanwei33]

/label cherry-pick-approved

[dobsonj]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30620 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[dobsonj]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30620 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30620 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
• bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jsafrane]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dobsonj: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/csi-operator#195

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

• openshift/release#49787 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30621 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is sort of a backport of #194 to 4.15 where aws-ebs is built (before azure-disk and azure-file were added). The intent is to eventually remove the legacy directory, which means we have to move the manifests first.

It also creates Dockerfile.test which already exists in the master branch but not 4.15.

$ cp legacy/aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator/test/e2e/manifest.yaml test/e2e/aws-ebs/
$ cp Dockerfile.aws-ebs.test Dockerfile.test

Also remove the legacy test-unit and verify targets from the Makefile (we should be running these against the code we compile instead).

/cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator-container-v4.15.0-202403271311.p0.gdad367b.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.