[HAC-2169] Details page component (header + horizontal nav)

[vidyanambiar]

Note: This PR depends on PR #156

Jira ticket: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/HAC-2169

Test with yarn storybook.

This PR combines the details page header component and the horizontal nav to create a details page component.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 17.74% // Head: 22.31% // Increases project coverage by +4.56% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (ae13875) compared to base (7dba4fb).
Patch coverage: 53.66% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #164      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   17.74%   22.31%   +4.56%     
==========================================
  Files          44       59      +15     
  Lines        1544     1788     +244     
  Branches      413      466      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits          274      399     +125     
- Misses       1270     1388     +118     
- Partials        0        1       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../details-page-header/DetailsPageHeader.stories.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...-utils/src/components/details-page-header/index.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...etails-page-header/utils/ActionButtons.stories.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...s/details-page-header/utils/ActionMenu.stories.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../details-page-header/utils/Breadcrumbs.stories.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rc/components/details-page/DetailsPage.stories.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...-utils/src/components/details-page/DetailsPage.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...s/lib-utils/src/components/horizontal-nav/index.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ls/src/components/horizontal-nav/HorizontalNav.tsx	93.33% <71.42%> (-6.67%)	⬇️
...mponents/details-page-header/DetailsPageHeader.tsx	80.00% <80.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[florkbr]

FWIW this diff is much smaller when merged with upstream now, though Github is still showing the entire diff on this PR.

https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk/compare/main...florkbr:dynamic-plugin-sdk:details-page?diff=unified

[florkbr]

/lgtm

[florkbr]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: florkbr, vidyanambiar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [florkbr]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@vidyanambiar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.