Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge from upstream metal3-io/ironic-image #289

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 11, 2022

Conversation

dtantsur
Copy link
Member

  • Add option to to listen on single inspector interface when inspector running without reverse proxy
  • Move hardys to emeritus_approvers
  • Pin Werkzeug to 2.1.2 until newer version of sushy-tools is out
  • Update sushy-tools to version 0.20.0
  • Support for unix sockets in reverse proxy mode
  • Allow customizing public ports for Ironic and Inspector

mboukhalfa and others added 13 commits May 24, 2022 20:07
Werkzeug 2.2.0 broke behavior of sushy-tools until version 0.20.0
is out.
Pin Werkzeug to 2.1.2 until newer version of sushy-tools is out
This brings back full compatibility with latest versions of Werkzeug
after changes in 2.2.0
…single-inspector-if-on-noproxy-case/mohammed

Add option to to listen on a single inspector interface
Since httpd, ironic and inspector share a volume, there is no point
in allocating private ports and making their communication go through
the network stack. Allow using unix sockets instead.
Support for unix sockets in reverse proxy mode
While 6385 and 5050 are reasonably established, an operator may choose
to assign different ports (e.g. in case of a conflict).

This change also makes it possible to have different listen and access
ports for the rare case when there is another indirection between
consumers and API (e.g. in case of OpenShift we want to have another
reverse proxy on control plane nodes).
Allow customizing public ports for Ironic and Inspector
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dtantsur

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 11, 2022
@elfosardo
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2022

@dtantsur: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 071a83f into openshift:master Aug 11, 2022
@dtantsur dtantsur deleted the sync branch August 11, 2022 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants