OCPNODE-1892: Rebase 1.29.0 #1815
Conversation
Signed-off-by: James Sturtevant <jstur@microsoft.com>
update docs for v1.29 release (note this must be committed after code freeze)
wait.PollUntilContextCancel immediately executes condition once
Add a test that checks if the CRB (kubeadm:cluster-admins) used for binding admin.conf file users (part of the kubeadm:cluster-admins Group) to the "cluster-admins" ClusterRole exists in kubeadm clusters. It does that only for versions newer than the version when this feature was added.
…dex-load-test Benchmark job with backoff limit per index
…conf test/e2e_kubeadm: add test for the kubeadm:cluster-admins CRB
etcd: Update to version 3.5.10
Add conformance tests for flowcontrol APIs
…hanges Kubelet disk api changes
…dex-remaining-e2e-test Add remaining e2e tests for Job BackoffLimitPerIndex based on KEP
Add Azure to the list of providers that support accessing nodes using SSH. Note: This will require a follow up PR adding the required environment variables, AZURE_SSH_KEY, KUBE_SSH_BASTION to the test configuration.
CEL Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <anish.ramasekar@gmail.com>
…k-test Add multi-webhook integration test
…r_info_fix [StructuredAuthn] Ensure empty fields of user object are accessible by CEL
Signed-off-by: kerthcet <kerthcet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kerthcet <kerthcet@gmail.com>
kube-dns as an alternative DNS addon to CoreDNS hasn't been supported since 1.22 when kubeadm's v1beta3 API was added. Remove the related tests from the e2e_kubeadm test framework.
I am having difficulties convincing myself if this is better or worse. I didn't implement this originally because I didn't want to store nodes that we weren't sure we've configured. However: if EnsureLoadBalancer fails we should retry the call from the service controller. Doing it like this might save us one update call from the node controller side for calls which have already started executing from the service controller's side...is this really that expensive at this point though? Is it really that dangerous to not do either, given that we retry failed calls? Ahhhhh!!! Opinions, please! Help, please!
Kubelet should advertise the shared cpus as extedned resources. This has the benefit of limiting the amount of containers that can request an access to the shared cpus. For more information see - openshift/enhancements#1396 Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <titzhak@redhat.com>
Adding a new mutation plugin that handles the following: 1. In case of `workload.openshift.io/enable-shared-cpus` request, it adds an annotation to hint runtime about the request. runtime is not aware of extended resources, hence we need the annotation. 2. It validates the pod's QoS class and return an error if it's not a guaranteed QoS class 3. It validates that no more than a single resource is being request. 4. It validates that the pod deployed in a namespace that has mixedcpus workloads allowed annotation. For more information see - openshift/enhancements#1396 Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <titzhak@redhat.com>
Restore `migratedPlugins` entry for in-tree vSphere volumes and mark them as migrated. Otherwise the CSI volume plugin ignores in-tree vSphere volumes and they will never get attached / mounted by CSI migration. The entry in `migratedPlugins` was incorrectly removed during CSIMigrationvSphere feature gate removal.
…force 2nd labeling to make tests work
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade |
|
@wallylewis: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/957b0f00-9f64-11ee-955e-6673503d76c8-0 |
soltysh
force-pushed
the
rebase-1.29.0
branch
from
d28345e
to
8676e3b
Compare
|
/hold cancel |
openshift-ci
bot
added
backports/validated-commits
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh, wallylewis The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test unit |
1 similar comment
|
/test unit |
|
/override ci/prow/unit |
|
@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/unit In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
@soltysh: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit b0d609f
into
openshift:master
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-pod-container-v4.16.0-202312210731.p0.gb0d609f.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-pod. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-hyperkube-container-v4.16.0-202312210731.p0.gb0d609f.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-hyperkube. |
/hold