Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1780318: MCD: tolerate all taints #1760

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 4, 2020

Conversation

runcom
Copy link
Member

@runcom runcom commented May 28, 2020

This is supposed to fix the BZ in $subject and it's the same as BZs like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813479. The impact of a change like this isn't fully clear as mentioned in the DNS PR as well openshift/cluster-dns-operator#171 (comment)

I'm opening this PR to get some more eyes and testing on this - @derekwaynecarr @smarterclayton ptal

The BZ has been pushed to 4.6 following what the DNS team did as well.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@linux.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1780318, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1780318: MCD: tolerate all taints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 28, 2020
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented May 28, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1780318, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1780318, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1780318: MCD: tolerate all taints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented May 28, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented May 28, 2020

/retest

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented May 28, 2020

@stbenjam ping for the metal-ipi e2e sort of constantly failing, can you help assess if this PR is breaking it or it's transient?

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

In theory I think this is correct. Should we skip 4.5 and put this into early 4.6 so to let the change of behaviour soak? I don't think this will break any existing clusters anyways.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 3, 2020

In theory I think this is correct. Should we skip 4.5 and put this into early 4.6 so to let the change of behaviour soak? I don't think this will break any existing clusters anyways.

yep, BZ is already 4.6 and now that master is open we can get this in to test it out

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 3, 2020

/skip

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 3, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1780318, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 3, 2020
@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 3, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

all good now then

Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: runcom, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 4, 2020

@runcom: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 0ffd997 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit fd059b7 into openshift:master Jun 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-config-operator#1760. Bugzilla bug 1780318 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1780318: MCD: tolerate all taints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 11, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.5
/cherry-pick release-4.4
/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@runcom: new pull request created: #1814

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.5
/cherry-pick release-4.4
/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 11, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@runcom: new pull request created: #1815

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Jun 11, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@runcom: new pull request created: #1816

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants