Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1822803: Add nil check for pod in case of Eventf() #59

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2020
Merged

Bug 1822803: Add nil check for pod in case of Eventf() #59

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2020

Conversation

s1061123
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@s1061123: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1822803, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1822803: Add nil check for pod in case of Eventf()

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 21, 2020
@tedyu
Copy link
Contributor

tedyu commented Apr 21, 2020

/retest

@tedyu
Copy link
Contributor

tedyu commented Apr 21, 2020

go vet:

##[error]vet: webhook/webhook.go:35:61: NetworkAttachmentDefinition not declared by package types
##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

Not related to this PR.

To troubleshooting #481, adds error message for further analysis.
@s1061123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Docker-build/Go-Build-ppc64le are failed due to CGO_ENABLED=1. Not related to this fix.

@dougbtv
Copy link
Member

dougbtv commented Apr 21, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dougbtv, s1061123

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1683374 into openshift:master Apr 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@s1061123: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/multus-cni#59. Bugzilla bug 1822803 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1822803: Add nil check for pod in case of Eventf()

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants