Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test/extended: skip "Services should be rejected when no endpoints exist" for OVNKubernetes #24147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2019

Conversation

dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw dcbw commented Nov 13, 2019

Not expected to work yet. Only recently was re-enabled for SDN too, so clearly
it's not a huge issue that the test fails (at least for now).

@danwinship

…ist" for OVNKubernetes

Not expected to work yet. Only recently was re-enabled for SDN too, so clearly
it's not a huge issue that the test fails (at least for now).
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 13, 2019
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-ovn-kubernetes

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2019
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 13, 2019

/test e2e-gcp

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 13, 2019

/test e2e-aws-ovn-kubernetes

level=info msg="Waiting up to 30m0s for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-3yht71y7-469c7.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to initialize..."
level=info msg="Cluster operator console Progressing is True with SyncLoopRefreshProgressingInProgress: SyncLoopRefreshProgressing: Working toward version 0.0.1-2019-11-13-213600"
level=info msg="Cluster operator console Available is False with DeploymentAvailableFailedUpdate: DeploymentAvailable: 1 replicas ready at version 0.0.1-2019-11-13-213600"
level=info msg="Cluster operator insights Disabled is False with : "
level=info msg="Cluster operator insights UploadDegraded is True with UploadFailed: Unable to report: unable to build request to connect to Insights server"
level=fatal msg="failed to initialize the cluster: Cluster operator console has not yet reported success"
2019/11/13 22:44:10 Container setup in pod e2e-aws-ovn-kubernetes failed, exit code 1, reason Error

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Nov 13, 2019 via email

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 13, 2019
@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Nov 14, 2019 via email

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, dcbw, knobunc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 14, 2019

/test e2e-cmd
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-gcp-builds

@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-builds

1 similar comment
@rcarrillocruz
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-builds

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Nov 14, 2019

Ooh, the test failure might be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765280, so we have a chance to debug. Let's see.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@knobunc
Copy link
Contributor

knobunc commented Nov 14, 2019

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@knobunc: Overrode contexts on behalf of knobunc: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 14, 2019

/refresh

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

What's the eta on a fix?

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov merged commit 2935b6c into openshift:master Nov 14, 2019
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

I for instance would call this a blocker for GA.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 14, 2019

What's the eta on a fix?

@smarterclayton next week. Note that this test was skipped for openshift-sdn until 2 days ago in #23370 because it was broken there as well for a long time. It appears that the 1.16 rebase may have fixed the test due to fixes in 1.16's kube-proxy. Point being, it's been broken for long enough in SDN that I can't see how it being broken for a week or so more in OVN is a problem :)

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

If I had known it was broken I would have blocked 4.1 :)

This is a foundational reliability / sanity thing for services on the cluster (the difference between blackhole and reject is massive in debugability).

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Please make sure there is a release blocker bug open for this.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcbw commented Nov 14, 2019

Please make sure there is a release blocker bug open for this.

@smarterclayton https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772655

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants