New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Generate test name updates rather than calculate dynamically #24445
test: Generate test name updates rather than calculate dynamically #24445
Conversation
/retest |
1a9ac91
to
ce13500
Compare
698f7c8
to
4cceaeb
Compare
/retest |
4cceaeb
to
60ba5bb
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
60ba5bb
to
2c65427
Compare
/retest |
624aac6
to
208ff9f
Compare
We noticed a 2x CPU regression in e2e runs, and these are unfortunately the culprit.
It is expensive to perform 100 checks against 1k names on every startup. Instead, move these to generated files that can be reviewed out of bounds on change. Add them to generated-bindata for verification and regen.
Also move skip logic into provider initialization, and buffer a small amount of suite output. GCP tests are excluded from core infra, they are not used.
208ff9f
to
85a55fd
Compare
/test e2e-cmd |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
10 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/refresh |
/test all |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
Merging to reduce CPU use and unblock David. |
@smarterclayton: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
It is expensive to perform 100 checks against 1k names on every startup.
Instead, move these to generated files that can be reviewed out of bounds
on change. Add them to generated-bindata for verification and regen.