-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
23.05 Wrong route subnet calculation #17
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
Indeed, that one is on me :/ |
openwrt-bot
pushed a commit
to openwrt/openwrt
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2023
8587c074f1eb interface-ip: fix IPv4 route target masking Fixes: openwrt/netifd#17 Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
openwrt-bot
pushed a commit
to openwrt/openwrt
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2023
A previous commit supposed to mask out excess host bits in route targets failed to correctly calculate the mask value, causing it to produce improper results for certain mask lengths. Fixes: openwrt/netifd#17 Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
1 task
1 task
Vladdrako
pushed a commit
to Vladdrako/openwrt
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
8587c074f1eb interface-ip: fix IPv4 route target masking Fixes: openwrt/netifd#17 Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
UCI, network:
results to:
OpenWrt version
r23497-6637af95aa
OpenWrt target/subtarget
x86/64
Device
AMI Corporation Aptio CRB
Image kind
Official downloaded image
Steps to reproduce
Add a route to 172.16.0.0/12 via UCI or LUCI
Actual behaviour
actually, the result is a route to 172.0.0.0/12 instead of 172.16.0.0/12
Expected behaviour
No response
Additional info
I'm sure, this bug comes with one of the latest updates because I had already installed 23.05 with functional routing
Diffconfig
No response
Terms
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: