Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle missing object ids #11

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2016
Merged

Handle missing object ids #11

merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2016

Conversation

brad
Copy link
Member

@brad brad commented May 9, 2016

@orcasgit/orcas-developers Please review. This should make the task for processing notifications more robust. I wrapped the process_message method for each data type in an extensive try...except

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 9, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 98.085% when pulling 55cb569 on handle-missing-object-ids into 92f1f64 on master.

@@ -3,24 +3,15 @@
import sys

from celery import shared_task
from celery.contrib import rdb
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@brad Did you forget to remove rdb 😏 ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😳

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 9, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 98.081% when pulling f126f6d on handle-missing-object-ids into 92f1f64 on master.

@percyperez
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thanks for the tests :shipit:

@percyperez percyperez merged commit 40c7088 into master May 9, 2016
@percyperez percyperez deleted the handle-missing-object-ids branch May 9, 2016 23:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants