Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Well, suppose that using "Alt+Q" would be another way to hit the Queue button. That's better than tab or the mouse, but I still think "Shift+Enter" would be a better shortcut than "Alt+Q." Currently both the Close and Jump Buttons have shortcuts, "Esc" and "Return," in addition to being able to use "Alt+c" and "Alt+j". I think the Queue button deserves one as well, and I reccomend "Shift+Enter". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks @lunesar for the suggestion. Your code compiled fine but did not work though. :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for fixing my bug in the suggestion and making those commits to implement my suggestion, I appreciate it. I wonder why |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Both assumptions are correct. The event state has several bits for different modifier keys. And yes, "Ctrl+Shift+Enter" also triggers the Queue button now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Right now when you use "J" to open the "Jump to Song" window you can immediately type in a song name and then either hit enter or click the "Jump" button to close the window and start playing the song. There is also a queue button which is extremely useful if you just want to add the song to the queue and keep the "Jump to Song" window open.
What I would like to add would be that instead of having to use queue button either with the mouse of hitting "Tab" several times, I would like be able to just use "Shift+Enter" to have the same effect as the queue button but still have the Filter dialog still active so I can type in the name of the next song that I would like to queue or jump to.
Here's my proposed change to src/libaudgui/jump-to-track.cc:
from
to
I confirmed that this will compile with
make
. I had to useautoheader
andautoconf
before being able to run./configure
but I eventually got it to where I couldrun make
andmake install
. However, I couldn't get my locally compiled instance to open, so I must have something wrong in trying to locally compile it. I was hoping to test it locally before bringing this up, but I couldn't get it to open. Hopefully this code change looks reasonable enough. It would be a nice feature that I would use a lot. Thanks.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions