GitHub Actions stuck in queue – ubuntu-latest runners busy despite available minutes #211398
Replies: 2 comments
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
|
Nothing in your numbers blocks this. You have 451 included minutes left, and that message only means no runner has picked the job up yet. It is not a quota error. One repo side cause to check first: your concurrency group. With cancel-in-progress: false, if an earlier run of this workflow is still running or queued, every new run in the group waits behind it. Check for an older sync run that never finished. If there is no older run, it is GitHub side capacity. This week has a stack of identical reports in this category, jobs sitting queued on ubuntu-latest while minutes are available. Those clear on their own, there is no setting to change. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
ARC (Actions Runner Controller)
Discussion Details
Hello GitHub Community,
I'm experiencing an issue with GitHub Actions where my workflow remains queued and never starts executing.
Repository details
Error message
GitHub Actions usage
Workflow configuration
The workflow was still waiting for a runner after more than five minutes.
What I need help with
ubuntu-latestrunner?My GitHub Actions usage shows remaining included minutes, and my workflow configuration appears valid.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thank you!
All reactions