Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure out solution to bending problem #4

Open
dbenamy opened this issue Oct 26, 2013 · 5 comments
Open

Figure out solution to bending problem #4

dbenamy opened this issue Oct 26, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@dbenamy
Copy link
Member

dbenamy commented Oct 26, 2013

No description provided.

@dbenamy
Copy link
Member Author

dbenamy commented Oct 26, 2013

Possible solutions:

@leodearden
Copy link

So, from the discussion in the hangout, the main distortion is the box sections bending, rather than collapsing.

The machine either needs to work with less force or be stiffer.

To radically increase the bending stiffness of the ironworker beams requires using taller member(s). At present each of the four boxes bends nearly independently. If the stack of four boxes was bonded into a single structural member then it would be 4^4/4 = 64 times stiffer.

That could be achieved by:

  • Welding all the boxes together along their lengths
  • using a plate that covers all of both sides and a huge number of bolts
  • using enough small plates on the sides that they behave like one box
  • Replacing the stack of boxes with a single large I-beam, bigger box, or similar

For shearing, I think the operation could be completed with less force by cutting at a steeper angle: at the moment the blades come together almost parallel. If they crossed at an angle, so that one edge of the blade bites through before the other side has fully contacted the bar then less force would be needed. The disadvantages of this approach may include:

  • more distortion of cut piece
  • it's not really applicable to punching

@dbenamy
Copy link
Member Author

dbenamy commented Oct 27, 2013

@leodearden, This is a really helpful analysis, thanks!

Of these options, my preference would be to try a number of smaller plates along the sides and to increase the cutting angle a bit, since both of these can be done with pretty much the standard parts (http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Warehouse) and without too much extra work.

@dbenamy
Copy link
Member Author

dbenamy commented Oct 29, 2013

The 1/2" tubing + a pair of extra plates on top did the trick!

I'll post pictures soon and update the assembly guide (and BOM).

We could use help updating the 3d model.

@ghost ghost assigned dbenamy Oct 29, 2013
@dbenamy
Copy link
Member Author

dbenamy commented Jan 12, 2014

Here's a picture showing the extra plates we added (but not yet showing the final legs).

To do:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants