-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
Evaluation of process inspector #125
Comments
Tried to reproduce ZOOKEEPER-2212 with several configs. All the experiments are done on my local lenovo pc. (Xeon E3-1220 v3 * 4, 8 GB RAM)
|
Also tested ZOOKEEPER-2137 with the latest ZooKeeper (just 50 times on 4 CPUs):
This reproducibility is useful enough (on 4 CPUs). I keep this issue ticket open for discussion. PTAL @mitake |
Evaluated some YARN (apache/hadoop@4e4b3a8 ) tests using 13aa33b ( Tests are executed 100 times with/without Earthquake. Note that this version of Earthquake does not contain an optimization (#146)
|
I found sometimes it is better to apply Namazu (formerly named Earthquake) for Testcase: YARN-5043 (RM/TestAMRestart) (apache/hadoop@06413da Stress:
TODO:
|
I'd like to report my experiment of etcd 5022: etcd-io/etcd#5022
Both of a number of test running in the above experiments is 1000. Parameters of explorer policy:
|
According to #125 Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
According to #125 Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
We need to quantitatively evaluate the process inspector as well as the Ethernet inspector
(FOSDEM presentation slide)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: