Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add option for data frame #127

Conversation

Aposhian
Copy link

@Aposhian Aposhian commented May 9, 2023

Related Issues & PRs

#33

Summary of Changes

  • add parameter to control whether points are transformed to sensor frame or left in the lidar frame, and have them stamped accordingly.

Validation

In progress. If the TFs are setup correctly, both results should result in equivalent visualizations in rviz or foxglove.

@Samahu Samahu self-requested a review June 2, 2023 20:57
@Samahu Samahu changed the base branch from ros2 to ros2-compatibility-mode June 2, 2023 21:00
@Samahu Samahu changed the base branch from ros2-compatibility-mode to fireflyautomatix-config-data-frame-staging June 2, 2023 23:01
Copy link
Contributor

@Samahu Samahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I will merge into a staging branch, run my own verification.
Then re-work your code a bit in a way that is compatible with the ongoing #146 PR

@Samahu Samahu marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2023 23:04
@Samahu Samahu changed the base branch from fireflyautomatix-config-data-frame-staging to ros2 June 2, 2023 23:12
@Samahu Samahu changed the base branch from ros2 to fireflyautomatix-config-data-frame-staging June 2, 2023 23:13
@Samahu Samahu deleted the branch ouster-lidar:fireflyautomatix-config-data-frame-staging June 2, 2023 23:46
@Samahu Samahu closed this Jun 2, 2023
@Samahu
Copy link
Contributor

Samahu commented Jun 2, 2023

@Aposhian somehow I closed you PR since I deleted the staging branch that I was using to resolve the conflicts between our repo and yours .. I had to do this because I don't have access to edit the PR.. I wanted to delete my branch and start from the point where our repos were on the same page. so I deleted my branch and by doing that it and since the PR was point the deleted branch it closed the PR. long story short I will accommodate your suggestion into the PR #146 which already references this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants