Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ indicator upgrader: smart dataset detection #2595

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

lucasrodes
Copy link
Member

@lucasrodes lucasrodes commented May 3, 2024

Improves the current implementation of the Indicator Upgrader. Addresses the first and second bullet points from #2580 (detect new datasets, propose smart migrations).

I'll be tracking future work in #2610

@owidbot
Copy link
Contributor

owidbot commented May 3, 2024

Quick links (staging server):

Site Admin Wizard

Login: ssh owid@staging-site-enhance-indicator-upgrade-2

Chart diff: No new or modified charts. Details
data-diff: ✅ No differences found
Legend: +New  ~Modified  -Removed  =Identical  Details
Hint: Run this locally with etl diff REMOTE data/ --include yourdataset --verbose --snippet

Automatically updated datasets matching weekly_wildfires|excess_mortality|covid|fluid|flunet|country_profile are not included

Edited: 2024-05-03 19:12:28 UTC
Execution time: 17.94 seconds

@lucasrodes lucasrodes mentioned this pull request May 3, 2024
39 tasks
@lucasrodes lucasrodes changed the title ✨ indicator upgrader: smart dataset detection (2) ✨ indicator upgrader: smart dataset detection May 3, 2024
@lucasrodes lucasrodes marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2024 23:14
@lucasrodes lucasrodes mentioned this pull request May 6, 2024
22 tasks
@lucasrodes lucasrodes merged commit 60ecdab into master May 6, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@lucasrodes lucasrodes deleted the enhance-indicator-upgrade-2 branch May 6, 2024 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants