Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Per user homestorage #23824

Closed
rullzer opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Per user homestorage #23824

rullzer opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@rullzer
Copy link
Contributor

rullzer commented Apr 6, 2016

There are situations where not all users use the same type of homestorage.
Especially when migrating users on a live instance to a different kind of storage.

For example when migrating from POSIX storage to an ObjectStore (or vise versa).

I'm no ownCloud FS expert but how I envision this.

  • For all users we store in the database the kind of homestorage they have
  • We add an extra config variable to config.php to tell the system what kind of storage new users are going to get.

This way new users will use the new fancy storage directly. While we can migrate existing users slowly to the new storage.

@icewind1991 assigning to you as our FS guru.

CC: @cmonteroluque @DeepDiver1975

@rullzer rullzer added this to the 9.1-current milestone Apr 6, 2016
@icewind1991
Copy link
Contributor

The idea discussed was that we generate a mount configuration for the home storage in the same way as we handle external storages and than use that to create the home storage.

This allows full flexibility of having different configurations/backends per user

@rullzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

rullzer commented Apr 8, 2016

Yes that sounds good!

@rullzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

rullzer commented Apr 19, 2016

@icewind1991 any idea how much work this will be. As it is needed for the object store work. Also we need to make sure that we do not kill any exisitng home storages.

@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor

@rullzer what's the status ? I think you guys discussed an alternative approach ?

@PVince81 PVince81 modified the milestones: 9.1-current, 9.2-next Jun 14, 2016
@PVince81 PVince81 modified the milestones: backlog, 10.0 Apr 6, 2017
@PVince81
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #29502

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Aug 1, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants