Skip to content

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

@mroeschke mroeschke added Timedelta Timedelta data type Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution labels Apr 4, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.0.1 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member Author

Going to merge as the checks are green, but can address any follow ups

@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 5b525b4 into pandas-dev:main Apr 14, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the bug/dt_attr/non-nano branch April 14, 2023 17:48
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2023
mroeschke added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2023
…no overflows int32) (#52673)

* Backport PR #52391: BUG: dt.days for timedelta non-nano overflows int32

* fix test_map

---------

Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <10647082+mroeschke@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timedelta Timedelta data type
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: Values in DataTimeProperties.days overflowing due to int32 restriction in pandas-2.0
4 participants