Skip to content

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

Surfaced while implementing #55564

@@ -365,7 +365,9 @@ I/O
- Bug in :func:`read_excel`, with ``engine="xlrd"`` (``xls`` files) erroring when file contains NaNs/Infs (:issue:`54564`)
- Bug in :func:`to_excel`, with ``OdsWriter`` (``ods`` files) writing boolean/string value (:issue:`54994`)
- Bug in :meth:`pandas.read_excel` with an ODS file without cached formatted cell for float values (:issue:`55219`)
- Bug in reading and writing ``datetime64`` dtypes with non-nanosecond resolution failing to round-trip correctly (:issue:`55622`)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this mention read_hdf/to_hdf?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, will update

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated+green

@mroeschke mroeschke added IO HDF5 read_hdf, HDFStore Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution labels Oct 22, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.2 milestone Oct 23, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit ea65f90 into pandas-dev:main Oct 23, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the bug-pytables-non-nano branch October 23, 2023 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IO HDF5 read_hdf, HDFStore Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants