Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TST: Make test_complibs deterministic #53754

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

This tests seems to be flaky in the CI, hopefully making this test deterministic fixes things

@mroeschke mroeschke added CI Continuous Integration Unreliable Test Unit tests that occasionally fail labels Jun 20, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.1 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke modified the milestones: 2.1, 2.0.3 Jun 21, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 3a224a7 into pandas-dev:main Jun 22, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the ci/tst/test_complibs branch June 22, 2023 15:23
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2023
mroeschke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2023
…stic) (#53797)

Backport PR #53754: TST: Make test_complibs deterministic

Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <10647082+mroeschke@users.noreply.github.com>
canthonyscott pushed a commit to canthonyscott/pandas-anthony that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
* TST: Make test_complibs deterministic

* Make sure files are unique?

* Try unique key

* Just xfail test

* Check what is taking long

* Remove -v

* Filter warning
Daquisu pushed a commit to Daquisu/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2023
* TST: Make test_complibs deterministic

* Make sure files are unique?

* Try unique key

* Just xfail test

* Check what is taking long

* Remove -v

* Filter warning
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration Unreliable Test Unit tests that occasionally fail
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants