Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-instate PosixFS Threadpool #7848

Merged

Conversation

illicitonion
Copy link
Contributor

Removing this threadpool introduced a significant performance regression to the export goal, for as-yet undiagnosed reasons.

This is a dirty revert of #7822, #7688, and #7685, and adding a tiny commit on top to support thread-local logging.

I will hopefully investigate and re-land fixing up the regression at some point.

@illicitonion illicitonion requested review from stuhood and ity June 4, 2019 22:19
@stuhood stuhood added this to the 1.17.x milestone Jun 5, 2019
@illicitonion illicitonion merged commit 0d9d214 into pantsbuild:master Jun 5, 2019
@illicitonion illicitonion deleted the dwagnerhall/revertthreadpool branch June 5, 2019 11:05
illicitonion added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2019
Removing this threadpool introduced a significant performance regression to the `export` goal, for as-yet undiagnosed reasons.

This is a dirty revert of #7822, #7688, and #7685, and adding a tiny commit on top to support thread-local logging.

I will hopefully investigate and re-land fixing up the regression at some point.
Copy link
Contributor

@ity ity left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

had a quick browse - lgtm, thanks!

illicitonion added a commit to twitter/pants that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2019
illicitonion added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2019
This reverts #7848 and fixes the performance issue found in it.

The first commit is just a revert (with a few manual merge cleanups), the second commit fixes the performance issue.

Fixes #7896
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants