-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
Conversation
batch all now looking a bit expensive compared to batch. no big changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I'm beta testing a new swc-web version. Feedback welcome! |
FYI try to test using Oliver's tool => |
bot merge |
Thanks for the hint! Somehow the docker and the git autoupdate script mess up sometimes. |
I prefer using tags or branches as this is what CI will end up using. Thansk for the fix. I am surprised to see 0 results however, even with 1% threshold. |
Okay fair enough. Still need to figure our a way to do this more reliably as it can currently spit out some 'git checkout' errors.
Yea the folder is incorrect, there are no changes in PS: It would probably make sense to use all files from |
batch all now looking a bit expensive compared to batch. no big changes.
transfer ownership of uniques cheaper.
batch all now looking a bit expensive compared to batch.
no big changes.