Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

removed pallet::getter from pallet-sudo #3370

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024
Merged

removed pallet::getter from pallet-sudo #3370

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

muraca
Copy link
Contributor

@muraca muraca commented Feb 17, 2024

@muraca
removed pallet::getter from pallet-sudo
7df962c 
Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <mmuraca247@gmail.com>
@muraca muraca requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2024 10:16
@muraca muraca mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2024
Open
63 tasks
gupnik
gupnik approved these changes Feb 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
substrate/frame/sudo/src/extension.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kianenigma kianenigma added R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. T13-deprecation The current issue/pr is, or should be, part of a deprecation process. and removed T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. labels Feb 19, 2024
@kianenigma kianenigma added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2024
@kianenigma kianenigma removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Feb 19, 2024
@kianenigma kianenigma removed the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Feb 19, 2024
@ggwpez ggwpez added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Feb 19, 2024
@ggwpez ggwpez added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into paritytech:master with commit 435e339 Feb 19, 2024
141 of 145 checks passed
ordian added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
@ordian
Merge branch 'master' into ao-collator-parent-head-data
739e63c 
* master: (41 commits)
  Add Coretime to Westend (#3319)
  removed `pallet::getter` from `pallet-sudo` (#3370)
  gossip-support: add unittests for update authorities (#3258)
  [FRAME Core] remove unnecessary overrides while using derive_impl for frame_system (#3317)
  Update coretime-westend bootnodes (#3380)
  `im-online` removal cleanup: remove off-chain storage (#2290)
  Bump the known_good_semver group with 1 update (#3379)
  Fix documentation dead link (#3372)
  Make `sp-keystore` `no_std`-compatible and fix the `build-runtimes-polkavm` CI job (#3363)
  Remove unused `im-online` weights (#3373)
  Ensure referenda `TracksInfo` is sorted (#3325)
  rpc server: add rate limiting middleware (#3301)
  do not block finality for "disabled" disputes (#3358)
  fix(zombienet): docker `img` version to use in merge queues for bridges (#3337)
  Various nits and alignments for SP testnets found during bumping `polkadot-fellows` repo (#3359)
  Add broker pallet to `coretime-westend` (#3272)
  remove recursion limit (#3348)
  Update subkey README.md (#3355)
  Bump the known_good_semver group with 6 updates (#3347)
  Document LocalKeystore insert method (#3336)
  ...
muraca added a commit to muraca/polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
@muraca
prdoc for paritytech#3370
ec96fb2 
Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <mmuraca247@gmail.com>
@muraca
Copy link
Contributor Author

muraca commented Feb 19, 2024

@ggwpez the silent label was removed as I had to write a prdoc because these are breaking changes

@ggwpez
Copy link
Member

ggwpez commented Feb 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

How is this a breaking change?
Is the key function public or what?

@muraca
Copy link
Contributor Author

muraca commented Feb 20, 2024

All getters visibility is pub, while the storage items left behind might not have this visibility, for example here we have pub(super).
This is probably due to the fact that the key is managed by pallet logic and we don't want other runtime logic to modify it.

pallet_sudo::Key::<T>::get() is not accessible from other pallets.

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, so I also first added Silent to these and added to the queue, but then removed them.

If we are to be pedantic, they are all breaking changes.

@muraca
Copy link
Contributor Author

muraca commented Feb 20, 2024

pallet_sudo::Key::<T>::get() is not accessible from other pallets.

what should we do with this issue?

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

One solution would be to just remove the usage of all getters in pallets one by one, but keep the getters.

This will not be breaking change in any way, and do 99% of the work.

Then, in one breaking PR, we mark the getters as deprecated and/or remove them.

@ggwpez ggwpez mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Merged
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
@ggwpez
nit: add prdoc for 3370 (#3401)
60563b8 
Did not realize that
#3370 was indeed
breaking. cc @muraca

---------

Signed-off-by: Oliver Tale-Yazdi <oliver.tale-yazdi@parity.io>
@muraca
Copy link
Contributor Author

muraca commented Feb 23, 2024

One solution would be to just remove the usage of all getters in pallets one by one, but keep the getters.

Keeping the getter would not solve the issue, if you want to not use it.
Say that a pallet is using the sudo key, for whatever reason. If not with a getter, how will this other pallet access such data?

The solutions I see are either pub for all the storage items where we remove a getter, or we manually implement getters for items that must not be changed by other logic, for example the sudo key.

bgallois pushed a commit to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@muraca @kianenigma
removed pallet::getter from pallet-sudo (paritytech#3370)
1400ad5 
part of paritytech#3326 

@ggwpez @kianenigma @shawntabrizi

---------

Signed-off-by: Matteo Muraca <mmuraca247@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kian Paimani <5588131+kianenigma@users.noreply.github.com>
@nazar-pc nazar-pc mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2024
Merged
1 task
This was referenced Jun 5, 2024
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kianenigma kianenigma kianenigma left review comments

@gupnik gupnik gupnik approved these changes

@ggwpez ggwpez ggwpez approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes T13-deprecation The current issue/pr is, or should be, part of a deprecation process.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@muraca @ggwpez @kianenigma @gupnik