-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add some Love to WidgetMatcher #43
Conversation
Export MultiWidgetMatcher correctly Move into separate file Add API tests Allow a widgetProp/elementProp to return null
WalkthroughThe changes encompass a restructuring of widget matching and assertion functionalities in a Flutter testing framework. This overhaul involves relocating Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 13
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- lib/spot.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/src/spot/diagnostic_props.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/src/spot/selectors.dart (3 hunks)
- lib/src/spot/snapshot.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/src/spot/widget_matcher.dart (1 hunks)
- test/selectors/widget_matcher_test.dart (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 18
lib/src/spot/diagnostic_props.dart (1)
- 9-9: The import of
widget_matcher.dart
is added, but there's no direct usage of it in the provided code. Ensure that the imported entities are actually used within this file to avoid unnecessary imports.lib/spot.dart (2)
- 46-46: The removal of certain exports, such as
MutliMatchers
andWidgetMatcherExtensions
, may impact users relying on these entities. Confirm that these removals are intentional and communicated to users to manage potential breaking changes.- 59-65: The addition of
widget_matcher.dart
exports introducesMultiWidgetMatcher
,MultiWidgetMatcherExtensions
,PropertyCheckFailure
,WidgetMatcher
, andWidgetMatcherExtensions
. Ensure that these entities are intended to be public and documented for external use.lib/src/spot/widget_matcher.dart (4)
- 100-102: The
selector
parameter is marked as deprecated in favor ofelementSelector
. Ensure that this deprecation is clearly communicated in the documentation and that there is guidance for migration.- 160-175: The method
hasWidgetProp
uses asoftCheckHideNull
function to handle nullability checks. Ensure that this approach aligns with the overall error handling strategy of the testing framework and provides clear feedback to the user in case of assertion failures.- 199-214: Similar to
hasWidgetProp
, the methodhasElementProp
usessoftCheckHideNull
for nullability checks. Verify that this method's error handling and feedback mechanisms are consistent with the framework's standards.- 244-259: The method
hasRenderObjectProp
introduces type parameters for the render object and its property. Confirm that the usage of generics here is well-documented and that examples are provided to guide users on how to leverage this method effectively.lib/src/spot/snapshot.dart (2)
- 2-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The removal of
selectors.dart
import needs to be verified for potential impacts on the file's functionality, especially ifselectors.dart
contained entities used withinsnapshot.dart
.
- 2-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The removal of the TODO comment regarding making
WidgetSnapshot
implementWidgetMatcher
andMultiWidgetMatcher
suggests a design decision was made. Confirm that this decision is documented and that any necessary refactoring or interface adjustments have been completed.lib/src/spot/selectors.dart (9)
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [9-9]
The class
Spot
is documented as the root of aWidgetSelector
chain but itsself
getter returnsnull
. Ensure this design is intentional and clearly documented, especially regarding how it integrates with the rest of the widget selection framework.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [28-28]
The
@useResult
annotation is used correctly to indicate that the result of methods should be used. This is a good practice to prevent unused return values in widget selection methods.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [73-73]
The
@Deprecated
annotation onspotSingle<W>
method is used appropriately to guide users towards the preferredspot<W>().atMost(1)
usage. Ensure that deprecation timelines and migration paths are clearly communicated to users.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [117-117]
The
spotElement<W>
method's reliance on identity comparison for elements is consistent with the approach inspotWidget<W>
. This consistency is good, but again, ensure the documentation clearly explains when and why to use this method.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [214-214]
The
spotIcon
method is a useful addition for matchingIcon
widgets. Ensure performance considerations are taken into account when matching icons, especially in large widget trees.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [236-236]
The
spotKey<W>
method for matching widgets by key is crucial for certain testing scenarios. Verify that this method correctly handles different types of keys (e.g.,ValueKey
,UniqueKey
) and document any limitations.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [280-280]
The
_FirstElement
,_LastElement
, and_ElementAtIndex
classes are internal implementations for thefirst
,last
, andatIndex
methods. Ensure these implementations are thoroughly tested, especially edge cases like empty candidate lists or out-of-range indexes.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [384-384]
The
QuantitySelectors
andQuantityMatchers
extensions provide a powerful way to assert on the quantity of matched widgets. Ensure that the implementation of these methods is optimized for performance, especially in scenarios with large numbers of widgets.
- 1-6: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [436-436]
The
RelativeSelectors
extension allows specifying parent and child relationships in widget selection. This is a key feature for complex widget trees. Ensure that the implementation supports nested and deeply nested widget structures efficiently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/selectors/widget_matcher_test.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/selectors/widget_matcher_test.dart
MultiWidgetMatcher
correctlynull
Summary by CodeRabbit