Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make part of vim-pandoc #2

Open
Konfekt opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

make part of vim-pandoc #2

Konfekt opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@Konfekt
Copy link

Konfekt commented Nov 19, 2020

This plug-in improves on the vim-pandoc-completion-module of https://github.com/vim-pandoc/vim-pandoc , for example, by adding completion of labels on top of citation keys. Could it replace it?

Pinging @fmoralesc and @alerque as its maintainers.

@patashish704
Copy link
Owner

I don't think my plugin (pandoc-complete) can replace vim-pandoc. But feel free to use pandoc-complete along side vim-pandoc. Try disabling the bibliography completion of vim-pandoc for avoiding any conflicts.

@Konfekt
Copy link
Author

Konfekt commented Nov 19, 2020

I am sorry for my lousy lazy wording. Once citation keys can be completed from those completion sources supported in the vim-pandoc-completion-module, your plug-in is a superset of what the vim-pandoc-completion-module in https://github.com/vim-pandoc/vim-pandoc achieves (for example, by completing labels as well). Therefore, replacing just its vim-pandoc-completion-module by your plug-in would make users happy.

@patashish704
Copy link
Owner

That sounds good. I am fairly new to github practices. Are you suggesting I create a pull request on vim-pandoc?

@fmoralesc
Copy link

I would suggest it ;)

@patashish704
Copy link
Owner

Apologies, for extremely long wait. I finally got a chance to implement this in vim-pandoc. Have created a pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants