Update Privacy Principles #57
Conversation
Intended to resolve - #55
AramZS
added
the
call-for-consensus
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making this update. On w3.org is definitely better. If date-specific is preferred, then I would recommend using the February 2023 version. (It would also be possible just to refer to the latest /TR/ published version, but no strong feelings either way on that.)
| @@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ <h2>Scope</h2> | |||
| processing of personal information. Ways in which new features might | |||
| enable inappropriate processing include (but are not limited to) | |||
| enabling | |||
| of <a href="https://w3ctag.github.io/privacy-principles/#hl-recognition-cross-site">cross-site | |||
| of <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/DNOTE-privacy-principles-20221214/#hl-recognition-cross-site">cross-site | |||
| or cross context recognition</a> of users or | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, cross-context recognition is an explicitly-defined term now, so maybe that would be preferred, rather than
"cross-site or cross-context":
https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/DNOTE-privacy-principles-20230223/#dfn-cross-context-recognition
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Following @npdoty's suggested URL (with updated anchors). Hopefully those "permalink" links are as permanent as the name implies.
Co-authored-by: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Co-authored-by: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Intended to resolve - #55