-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
installation #2
Comments
Ran into this problem when doing Installing Paz on Vagrant
Please install etcdctl. Aborting. |
Perfect, will update the README. |
More progress, now reports 2 failed units. Here is the tail of the output:
Any hints on how to debug this? |
Some debugging tips: Which units are failing?
Viewing the logs of a failed service:
(add SSH into the machine:
View system logs (after SSHing):
I'm getting the same issue you are atm, so will be spending time debugging it this weekend. Using the alpha channel of CoreOS means things sometimes things change between releases. |
Another tip: When viewing the journal for a service, if you see an HTTP 403 from Docker then check your quay.io credential environment variables as described in the README. |
@pgte try again now, it's working for me after making a few fixes. |
A bit more progress, but still failing for me.
|
A |
Downloaded .dockercfg from quay.io and installed it in ~/.dockercfg.
looks ok. But now, when I run the installation script I get:
|
the registry key "quay.io" needs to be "https://quay.io" at the moment. I'll open an issue for this as it's too brittle and should work with or without the protocol. |
Created issue #7 for this. |
That fixed the reading of the file. |
Hmmm... now I get a 500. Here is the log for the orchestrator:
|
Hmm not very enlightening. Could you post some logs from the host around that time using |
Any luck with with @pgte? Can you confirm if you were running the integration test script or install-vagrant? Confirmed working on ArchLinux \o/ |
Had a dive into this over the weekend. $ sudo docker login https://quay.io
The error number FATA[0036] could change. Workaround was to put an entry in to hosts after finding out where quay.io resolved to.
So I Put the entry
Into my /etc/hosts file and login was fine |
Hey @No9, thanks for having a look and reporting this, it shouldn't be necessary to log into quay.io any more, however we are looking to deploy to https://registry.hub.docker.com as well, issue #23. I tried to replicate your login issue however it was successful for me, if anyone else has any problems to this then we can add a notice in the README. |
Thanks @tomgco |
Looks like it's time to just remove all that Docker auth stuff from the installation process. It's probably silently working for those of us who still have the credentials in our Created #27 |
Thanks for Paz, looking forward to playing with it, I tried to install via vagrant: How long should paz take to install via vagrant install? Starting paz runlevel 1 units
Unit paz-scheduler.service launched on 257b40cd.../172.17.8.102
Unit paz-orchestrator-announce.service launched on 23965b52.../172.17.8.103
Unit paz-service-directory.service launched on f441edc7.../172.17.8.101
Unit paz-service-directory-announce.service launched on f441edc7.../172.17.8.101
Unit paz-scheduler-announce.service launched on 257b40cd.../172.17.8.102
Unit paz-orchestrator.service launched on 23965b52.../172.17.8.103
Successfully started all runlevel 1 paz units on the cluster with Fleet
Waiting for runlevel 1 services to be activated...
Activating: 6 | Active: 0 | Failed: 0... Any ideas, what I might be doing wrong? |
@twilson63 thanks for taking it for a spin! There is no error in what you're seeing here, but the next step will take a while. It has started the units on the cluster but "starting" involves pulling the Docker images before running them. The base images (usually Ubuntu) are quite big and will take a while. If the units are evenly distributed across the cluster by Fleet then each host in your cluster will be pulling the same base images. Not ideal and it takes a while. The If anything goes wrong at this point please use |
Great! I think everything is running, but I can't seem to access any of the ip address. I have very limited use with vagrant, once everything is up, should I be able to access the web service by opening a browser to the ip Thanks for the help! |
If you've done the The services are all exposed on random ports by docker so there's nothing on port 80 but HAProxy, and that is configured to check for the service you want (the prefix in front of |
Cool, I think I fubared something: I will try again: On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Luke Bond notifications@github.com wrote:
Tom Wilson This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or |
A lot has changed since this issue was opened and it now spans a few people different issues. Going to close it and please open others with updates. Thanks all for the contributions! |
I'm going to do an installation and try to go by the book instead of trying to guess so that the onboarding of new developers can get easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: