fix: improves the ability to get all inline schemas and identify inline object schemas

[TristanSpeakEasy]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01% ⚠️

Comparison is base (976ca09) 99.79% compared to head (f28d681) 99.78%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #154      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.79%   99.78%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         146      146              
  Lines       10385    10403      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        10364    10381      +17     
- Misses         21       22       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.78% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
index/extract_refs.go	99.51% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[TristanSpeakEasy]

Seems to be an unrelated bit of code dropping coverage not sure how to target it with a test as a summary with two different node structures confuses me tbh

[daveshanley]

LGTM!

[daveshanley]

I am not concerned about any 0.01% code change; I generally see these as blips and not something to be concerned about.

[TristanSpeakEasy]

I am not concerned about any 0.01% code change; I generally see these as blips and not something to be concerned about.

Thanks @daveshanley ready to merge then :D

[daveshanley]

I can't merge it. Tells me there are conflicts?

[TristanSpeakEasy]

I can't merge it. Tells me there are conflicts?

@daveshanley very strange I just double checked and there are no conflicts and I see this

[daveshanley]

I can squash and merge, but I can't rebase. strange!