You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are there the intersection functions for the common analytic curves? like straightline/straightline, arc/straightline, arc/bspline, arc/arc and so on and on. It seems that we represent all curves using NURBS. If we treat all curves as NURBS to do intersection, will the result be accurate?
Thank you very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you find a case where an intersection result is not correct, it is a
bug.
You can represent any conic exactly using a NURBS curve. Under the hood,
verb represents all Curve and Surface types as a NURBS - not just for
intersection. This is the elegance of this particular representation.
True, certain types might be represented more compactly using another
formulation (and this might be in store in the future for verb), but
presently that would make the core far more complex for minimal space and
speed improvements.
Are there the intersection functions for the common analytic curves? like
straightline/straightline, arc/straightline, arc/bspline, arc/arc and so on
and on. It seems that we represent all curves using NURBS. If we treat all
curves as NURBS to do intersection, will the result be accurate?
Thank you very much.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2
.
Hi,
A quick question:
Are there the intersection functions for the common analytic curves? like straightline/straightline, arc/straightline, arc/bspline, arc/arc and so on and on. It seems that we represent all curves using NURBS. If we treat all curves as NURBS to do intersection, will the result be accurate?
Thank you very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: