there is bug when I use my own obj file

[FrankMelon1]

thanks for your great work!!!
it is working well when I use the obj. file that you give, but when I use my obj file, there comes bugs as below:

python obj2png.py -i /home/wutao/SMPL-master/obj2png-master/src/rp_janna_posed_004_30k.obj -v
Namespace(animate=False, azim=None, elevation=None, objfiles=['/home/wutao/SMPL-master/obj2png-master/src/rp_janna_posed_004_30k.obj'], outfile=None, quality=None, scale=None, view=True)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "obj2png.py", line 122, in
ob.Plot(outfile,elevation=elevation,azim=azim,dpi=dpi,scale=scale,animate=animate)
File "/home/wutao/SMPL-master/obj2png-master/src/ObjFile.py", line 178, in Plot
ax.plot_trisurf(self.nodes[:,0],self.nodes[:,1],self.nodes[:,2], triangles=tri)
IndexError: too many indices for array

Do you know how to solve this?
thank you so much!
rp_janna_posed_004_30k.zip

[durgesh17media]

@pclausen @FrankMelon1 any update on this ? as I am stuck with the exact same issue.

[pclausen]

@FrankMelon1 @durgesh17media
The problem is that my parser is too simple to accept files with the face format you have

$ tail rp_janna_posed_004_30k.obj
f 25449/26579/25449 4806/5146/4806 20683/21622/20683
f 20683/21622/20683 25445/26575/25445 25449/26579/25449
f 17288/18287/17288 1331/1333/1331 25444/26574/25444
f 25444/26574/25444 6310/6856/6310 25445/26575/25445
f 25445/26575/25445 3512/3830/3512 17288/18287/17288
f 17288/18287/17288 25444/26574/25444 25445/26575/25445
f 25444/26574/25444 1331/1333/1331 20323/21290/20323
f 20323/21290/20323 4688/5023/4688 25448/26578/25448
f 25448/26578/25448 6310/6856/6310 25444/26574/25444
f 25444/26574/25444 20323/21290/20323 25448/26578/25448

A quick hack before i fix it is to simplify the format eg with sed

$ sed -E 's!/[[:digit:]]+!!g' rp_janna_posed_004_30k.obj > rp.obj
$ tail rp.obj
f 25449 4806 20683
f 20683 25445 25449
f 17288 1331 25444
f 25444 6310 25445
f 25445 3512 17288
f 17288 25444 25445
f 25444 1331 20323
f 20323 4688 25448
f 25448 6310 25444
f 25444 20323 25448

I can't test on my tablet at the moment but i assume that simplified file will parse ok.

[pclausen]

it was actually issue with vertices parsing, now corrected. File has been added to test suite. Thanks for reporting.