Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

capabilities works fine on the emulator, kills the rest of the page on a real watch #139

Closed
PeterSumm opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@PeterSumm
Copy link

PeterSumm commented Sep 16, 2016

The capabilities property seems to work fine on the emulator (from Cloudpebble), but when I run it on my watch the rest of the configuration page is lost after that field. This happens with several different apps, but a much simpler app with an identical config file works fine.

Basalt watch, firmware 4.02, iOS app 4.1

I'll investigate further and add more details if I can.

@keegan-lillo
Copy link
Contributor

Please post your config.json and custom function.

On Sep 16, 2016 4:47 AM, "PeterSumm" notifications@github.com wrote:

The capabilities property seems to work fine on the emulator (from
Cloudpebble), but when I run it on my watch the rest of the configuration
page is lost after that field.

Basalt watch, firmware 4.02, iOS app 4.1

A much simpler app with an identical config file works fine.

I'll investigate further and add more details if I can.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#139, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADX8K7clLZ_Np7MJrRP8X4U9ZaF24wVyks5qqoHigaJpZM4J-23c
.

@PeterSumm
Copy link
Author

This is the source code for the project if that helps (it's open source).

The problem statements in config.js have been commented out.

moon_health_location_and_weather_watch (10).zip

@keegan-lillo
Copy link
Contributor

You are initializing clay inside of a ready event (line 539). This will not work. Clay needs that event internally to obtain the capabilities.

@PeterSumm
Copy link
Author

Yep, that fixed it. Sorry, I thought I'd tried that.

Thanks for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants